SNP activists are "biased" against people from ethnic minorities becoming party candidates, a former ally of Nicola Sturgeon has claimed.
Muhammad Shoaib, who last week quit the SNP for Labour, said SNP activists only wanted "coconut Pakistanis, not pure Pakistanis", meaning those who seemed "white inside".
He said the grassroots prejudice he faced when he tried unsuccessfully to become the SNP Westminster candidate for Glasgow Central earlier this year was "a factor" in his defection.
The SNP last night condemned the remarks as "utterly outrageous" and demanded Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy take disciplinary action against Shoaib.
Shoaib, who joined the SNP in 2007 after almost twenty years in Labour, was a long-time ally of Sturgeon, and campaigned for in the Glasgow Southside constituency.
When he revealed his plan to return to Labour, it is understood the First Minister urged him to change his mind, as did SNP minister Humza Yousaf.
However Shoaib, 62, an immigration adviser in Glasgow and former organiser of Scots Asians for Independence, switched to Labour regardless.
He told the Sunday Herald: "The leadership of the SNP were fine with me, but as for the grassroots workers, there's a huge barrier between ethnic minorities and Scottish Nationalist activists. You ask anybody in the party."
The SNP has one ethnic minority MSP, Yousaf, and one Westminster candidate, Tasmina Ahmed Sheikh in Ochil and South Perthshire.
But Shoaib said both were exceptions to the rule, and cited the recent blocking of two Asian councillors in North Lanarkshire who tried to become SNP Westminster candidates.
"There is no acknowledgement, there is no interaction with ethnic minorities. It's a huge divide.
"We knew that, apart from Tasmina, nobody else was going to succeed in the SNP. I told everybody long before the process started they wanted coconut Pakistanis, they don't want pure Pakistanis."
Asked if there was tokenism in the SNP, he said: "Yes. It's very very clear. She [Ahmed Sheikh] succeeded because she formed a very close relationship with Alex Salmond, otherwise she couldn't have succeeded.
"I think people are biased against ethnic minorities. I was in Labour 19 years. I did not face that sort of reception. I realised when I started phoning people [for the Glasgow Central selection] and five times they asked your name. You know, 'What is your name? Muhammad Shoaib. Is that your name? Yes, that's my name'. I felt gutted and after two days of phoning I stopped.
"In the leadership there's no racism, no bias. But on the grassroots level there is a problem."
However he said the flood of new SNP members should change attitudes for the better.
"I think in one or two years' time things will be a lot better than they are now."
Responding for the SNP, Yousaf said: ""These comments from Muhammad Shoaib are utterly outrageous. It is nothing short of racism to call Tasmina a 'coconut' simply because she has one white parent and one Asian parent. To then say she is not 'pure Pakistani' is beyond the pale.
"Jim Murphy must take disciplinary action immediately. These kind of comments have no place in our political discourse. Everyone who has any involvement with the SNP knows it to be an entirely inclusive and welcoming party, where people are selected as candidates on the basis of their ability, regardless of their background.
"Muhammad Shoaib has returned to the Labour Party, having failed to be selected as an SNP candidate through an open and upfront process - sadly, his sour grapes know no bounds."
A Labour spokesman said: "Mr Shoaib is reflecting his own experience of trying to win selection as an SNP candidate. He also maintains that his experience is not unique amongst other Black and Ethnic Minority members of the SNP."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article