Low-paid Scots would have earned almost £3,000 more over the last six years if the national minimum wage had kept pace with the cost of living, the SNP has claimed.
The minimum pay rate, which was first introduced by Labour in 2009, currently stands at £6.50 an hour - the equivalent of a full-time salary of £10,968.75 a year.
But according to figures from the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe), if the hourly rate had risen in line with the retail price index (RPI) it would now amount to £6.93 an hour, or £11,688.18 for a full-time worker.
While the national minimum wage has increased every year since it was introduced, these rises have been below the rate of RPI.
If the national minimum wage had kept up with RPI, workers on the minimum pay rate would have earned £2,948.34 more over the last six years, the SPICe figures suggest.
The SNP is calling for the powers to set the minimum wage to be devolved to Scotland, with nationalist MSP Sandra White arguing the figures are "damning evidence of how both Labour and Tory Westminster governments have let down low-paid people in Scotland".
Ms White said: "While people at the top are getting richer, workers earning the minimum wage are losing out to the tune of almost £3,000."
She claimed Westminster "simply isn't interested in standing up for working people", but said the SNP has a "strong track record" on the issue by paying the Living Wage to public sector staff, guaranteeing no compulsory redundancies in the public sector, and setting up the Fair Work Convention to champion better pay and good industrial relations.
Ms White said: "The Westminster parties have shown that they simply can't be trusted to stand up for low-paid workers. It is vitally important that powers over employment and the minimum wage are transferred to Scotland - to allow us to ensure that everyone in Scotland receives a fair day's pay for a fair day's work and to lift thousands of working people out of poverty."
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article