ALEX Salmond's proposal for an independent Scotland to share the pound with the rest of the UK damaged the Yes campaign's chances of victory, one of its leading figures has claimed.
Dennis Canavan, the chairman of Yes Scotland, the official pro-independence campaign, said other currency options should have been promoted in the run-up to September's poll.
The former Labour MP and Independent MSP also claimed the Yes campaign failed to win more support because it was "too nice" and should have been more forceful challenging the economic arguments of its opponents.
Mr Canavan was responding to comments by Gordon Wilson, a former SNP leader, who blamed defeat on the party's failure to build a sense of Scottish national identity.
In his first major interview since the defeat, Mr Canavan strongly rejected the claim, saying: "Gordon's a Nationalist, he's been a Nationalist for a long, long time.
"I'm not a Nationalist and there are many people involved in the Yes campaign who are not Nationalists.
"We see independence not as an end in itself, not simply as a form of national expression."
However, he backed claims made by Mr Wilson in a new book, Scotland: The Battle For Independence, that the Yes campaign struggled in the debate over Scotland's economic prospects.
Mr Canavan, who had argued an independent Scotland should have its own currency, said the Yes campaign was damaged by Mr Salmond's key proposal to share sterling with the rest of the UK.
The idea was rejected by the UK Government as risky and unworkable, although Mr Salmond insisted the claims were a "bluff".
Mr Canavan said the Yes Scotland board, which included another supporter of a separate currency, Green Party leader Patrick Harvie, was persuaded to follow SNP Government policy.
He said: "It became clear later the Scottish Government was going to go for a sterling currency union and obviously the Scottish Government was going to be the main player, leading negotiations in the event of a Yes vote.
"The Yes Scotland campaign therefore agreed that should be the starting point, whatever their individual views were.
"But I think the other options that were available, including the option of an independent currency, should have been better and more clearly spelled out at an earlier stage of the campaign.
"I think if that had been made clear it would have been better."
In his book Mr Wilson said he wrote to Mr Canavan during the campaign urging a change of direction and describing him as a "punchbag".
"I read that in The Herald and I have no recollection of receiving that letter from Gordon," said Mr Canavan. "I would not use the term punchbag but I certainly felt we were not being as proactive as we should have been.
"I think in retrospect we were too nice. I think 'Project Fear', which the other lot were coming out with, we should have been counteracting much more forcefully."
He added: "Despite the result, I still see a future for Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article