On Thursday evening, I took the train from Glasgow to Wishaw for the North Lanarkshire count. Once the safest Labour seat in Great Britain, I wanted to see the results come in for my hometown of Coatbridge, one of the seats least likely to go SNP.
But then again, that prediction was according to the pollsters, not the people chapping on doors.
See, as far as I can tell, Coatbridge is often underestimated; swept aside, considered among those places that would vote a monkey in, if only it wore a red rosette.
But in every conversation I had with any of my friends or family in these past months, whether they finished school or not, whether a teenager or a pensioner, the unemployed or the middle class, a Yes or No voter; every one was voting SNP.
The count was in the cavernous hall at Ravenscraig Sports Centre, fitted with bright yellow girders as if anticipating the proliferation of yellow maps in our morning newsfeeds.
Buzzing with the frenetic energy of the monumental, a flurry of yellow rosettes bounced from one end of the room to the other, smiling, hugging, rejoicing. A less buoyant team of reds sat quietly, pensively, as they hopelessly tried to make their tallies add up to a lead, floundering before the inevitable sink.
SNP candidates showed quiet confidence, with Phil Boswell MP saying discretely that this time, "its important not to be arrogant. But we're romping it! In Coatbridge!".
Labour candidates were notable in their absence.
Labour heartlands; that's what North Lanarkshire has been called. A once pounding, red heart of Scottish industry, now blackened and beaten from successive Tory governments.
And in one evening, these post-industrial, fringe towns became yellow. These towns, referenced only by commentators to implicate the struggle or bleak prospect of a Scottish, working class existence, chose change.
SNP critics, who rightly remain cynical of anyone who deigns themselves 'politician', are quick to pose questions to our newest establishment party.
What does 'progressive' really mean? What problems are posed by this one-party nation? What about the failures in our system which can't be blamed on Westminster?
But in places like Coatbridge, this shift away from Labour is nothing short of paradigmatic for the people; and the Labour members damning the surge in nationalism, the inquisitive critics, and the ideological sceptics, are all missing a vital statistic in their calculations of these heartlands.
See, this was not necessarily about a nationalist essentialism, the integrity of 'Tartan Tories', or a change in corporation tax policy. The victory speeches may have been near identical, but North Lanarkshire went SNP because of a subtext that addresses what these communities have been waiting to hear.
The SNP promise a fight. They promise representation. They promise to believe in Labour heartlands, when they've become so used to being considered shite. They promise that things can and will be better. And they do it with ease, because no one else is.
The men and women of Labour heartlands voted SNP out of sheer will and determination for a better future, and that must be commended and built on as we move forward.
This is the story that won Scotland on May 7. And the story that did not exist in England.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article