AFTER the lovebombing last week by David Cameron, his chancellor George Osborne travelled north to revel in his role as bad cop.
As Dirty Harry he carried a very large gun to shoot down Alex Salmond's plan to share the pound after independence, but the bullets were crafted by the longstanding Permanent Secretary to the Treasury, Sir Nicholas Macpherson.
Mr Osborne had with him a 76-page Scotland Analysis document, impenetrable to those of us without a PhD.
The Chancellor read out a 19-page speech based on its contents. But the real killer was a memo running to just over two pages by the top civil servant at the Treasury, Sir Nicholas Macpherson.
Nick, as he styles himself, penned a devastating critique of currency union in refreshingly lay language, but with characteristic Treasury arrogance that hinted only his department could ever run an economy, and certainly not pipsqueaks at St Andrew's House.
In fairness, the Treasury don't just sneer at Scots. They sneer at other Whitehall departments. But Sir Nick's words were gold dust for the Chancellor.
As a result Mr Osborne gave the impression of a card-player with a terrific concealed hand. In other words, he was even more than usually objectionable in his arrogant smugness.
The venue for the declaration, stacked with around 70 business types, was a dramatic penthouse with a panorama of Edinburgh Castle, Union flag fluttering, in the appropriately named Bread Street. Treasury dudes appeared blind to the coolness of this address.
Mr Osborne talked about "the pound in your pocket," the phrase coined by Harold Wilson in 1967 as he was forced into devaluation by a crippling national debt of £800 million. The UK national debt now stands at £1.16 trillion.
From the airy penthouse journalists were led down to a cold, barely lit basement for a briefing with the Chancellor and sight of the Macpherson memo. Maybe they were trying to create an echo of All the President's Men.
Whatever the venue, Mr Osborne was saying to Alex Salmond: "Do you feel lucky, punk?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article