There are truths in politics which resonate.
The ancient Greeks, Romans, and even Shakespeare have things to tell us, and a disparate range of political figures from Gandhi and Churchill to Mao are still quoted as relevant to contemporary politics
It's not surprising, then, approaching the independence referendum, to find a relevant quote from JFK, 50 years after his death. He suggested: "Let us begin anew - remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof."
The referendum campaign has been big on partisan insult, but less engaged in vision. The Yes campaign seem torn between offering a new future and the reassurance of continuity, whilst the No side have an approach which seems to hover somewhere between Project Fear and "Why bother?"
Accusations have flown back and forth, but the most common question is: "What will it be like after independence?" often followed by: "If you can't tell me, I'm not voting for it."
This, of course, is a bizarre approach.
I've voted in UK, Scottish, European, and Council elections since 1970. The one link between each election and the various parties contesting them has been the line: "We won't know what we will be able to achieve till we're elected and see the state of play". Promises are routinely made, predictions are avoided carefully.
We don't want to stray into a Rumsfeld world of "known unknowns", so a bit of honesty is called for on both sides, along with the civility to debate the kind of Scotland we would want after independence.
The truth is that an independent Scotland would start its days dependent on three things which are currently not predictable: the result of independence negotiations, the Government to be voted in at the first election after independence, and the state of relevant world affairs at the time.
It is no more predictable than is the state of the UK in three or four years' time.
The questions we should be asking are: "What kind of Scotland do we want to live in?" and "By which route are we most likely to get that Scotland?"
Currently, in public sector areas such as education and health, there are clear divisions between the approaches of the UK Government and the Scottish Government, and this has been the case in essence since the Scottish Parliament was reinstituted, irrespective of governing party.
Polls tell us that Scottish voters strongly support the current Scottish Government's policies, but also that they are, so far, disinclined to vote Yes to the possibility of more control over more of the same.
One thing that can be agreed upon by both sides is that, whichever way the vote goes, there is an element of risk.
Vote Yes - and you have no guarantees of what an Independent Scotland will be like; vote No - and you have no guarantees that any future Westminster Governments will change to take more cognisance of the wishes of Scots voters.
In the last analysis, more than party politics, flags, and history, the referendum vote is about judging that risk.
For what it's worth, when I had professional responsibility for health and safety in schools, I learned that the best way to minimise risk is to be in full control, and not leave it to others.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article