THERE'S a lurgy going round Holyrood this week.
Not the virus of nationalism diagnosed by Johann Lamont in her Labour conference speech, but a precocious winter cold that's already got the place brimming with coughs and snotters.
It would explain the extra-grouchy mood at First Minister's Questions, when the usual light sparring was more like trench warfare.
Never one to let good news go unpunished, Ms Lamont opened with a demand to know why £20 million of SNP help for those affected by benefit cuts this year might not be repeated in 2014. Or as she chirpily put it: "Why is the Scottish Government cutting help for victims of the bedroom tax by £20m next year?"
Ratcheting down his eyebrows from Jaunty to Offended Scowl, Alex Salmond sneered coldly at her first FMQs mention of the bedroom tax.
Now that London Labour Party was safely opposed, "we should congratulate Johann Lamont at last for raising it," he grumped.
But the FM's shivers only warmed his rival.
"He has decided not to act because he does not care about the victims of the bedroom tax - he would rather exploit their pain," she sniffed, merrily exploiting their pain for herself.
Political footballs are for kicking after all.
If he was serious, the FM should urge voters in England to vote Labour to abolish the tax, she even added. It was hard to tell if Labour or SNP backbenchers laughed more.
Ruth Davidson attacked Mr Salmond over pensions, but her point, generously assuming there was one, was lost in a tornado of figures that would have given an actuary a migraine.
When your snappiest soundbite is "7% to 26% is 3.71 pensioners for every worker", you might as well not bother turning up as a politician.
Nicola Sturgeon literally hugged her sides laughing, while John Swinney stared slack-jawed across the aisle with a sort of crazed delight, like a yokel who'd been hit by a shovel.
Nationalist viruses may have been missing, but the scrappy debating was sadly infectious. A plague on all your houses, as voters might say.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article