There's a moose loose...
EARLIER this year, Unspun brought news of the "Holyrood Mouse", which after being spotted in the parliament's media tower quickly acquired cult status and a spoof Twitter account.
It seems it was just the tip of the miceberg. New figures show "rodent sightings" in parliament leapt from 12 to 29 in the year to October. So on the night before Christmas, Holyrood's security watch should expect not so much a stirring, as a stampede of the wee beasties.
Supreme accolade
THE Scottish Parliamentary Journalists' Association presented their annual award this week to the member who wrote the most spectacularly incorrect story of the year.
The SPJA's strict code of omerta prevents us from revealing the name of the winner.
However, we can reveal that the rules had to be changed to allow a story produced last year - but confirmed as thunderously incorrect this year - to be thus honoured.
To compound the winner's misery, the rumour is that the Holyrood hacks are already planning to reverse their rule change at next year's awards.
Eternal optimist
THE HUNT is on for the punter whose bet of £5500 on a Yes vote, the second such stake, has shifted the odds at William Hill from 9/2 to 7/2 in favour of independence.
"A customer in his sixties, thought to be connected with the Yes campaign, placed the £5500 wager in a Hill's betting shop in Selkirkshire in the Scottish Borders area and will collect £32,500 if his hunch proves to be correct," said a spokesman.
Can we be the first to point out that Alex Salmond is still in his fifties?
Festive tidings
UNSPUN will be back on January 12 after our tribunes have returned to Holyrood for their year of destiny. Have a happy Christmas and a Guid New Year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article