THE SNP will today call for the abolition of the House of Lords, branding it an "absurd political institution".
The Nationalists, who are not represented in the second chamber, are calling for it to be replaced by a "democratic institution accountable to the electorate".
Labour recently announced it wanted an elected senate with members drawn from Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the English regions rather than from constituencies like MPs.
This morning, Pete Wishart, the SNP's MP for Perth, will use a debate in Westminster Hall, the Commons parallel chamber, to attack the current arrangement in the Lords and insist the institution is beyond reform and needs scrapping altogether.
Ahead of his debate, he said: "The House of Lords with its staggering 847 members, including hereditary peers and Bishops of the Church of England, is the most absurd political institution in the democratic world and it is right to describe it as an affront to our democracy.
"What should concern us just as much is not the embarrassment over its indefensible bloated size or the absurdity of its membership criteria, it is its potential and history of abuse, the total lack of accountability and its corrosive, distorting influence in our political life."
Acknowledging there were concerns about leaving the composition of the second chamber to party bosses, Mr Wishart insisted the real worry related to donors whose presence in the Lords was simply down to how much money they have given a particular party.
"'Cash for honours' is the most obvious recent example of this abuse when the former Prime Minister, Tony Blair, was questioned by the police and his chief fundraiser arrested. But since then appointments show donors are still a major feature.
"The public have a right to demand better than this and we now need to just abolish the whole unreformable place and put in place a democratic institution accountable to the electorate," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article