ED Miliband's decision to rule out any kind of formal pact with the SNP makes it easier to see how a minority Labour government would seek to operate after May 7.
As anxious Scottish Labour MPs were told before the election campaign, the strategy would be to defy the SNP to vote against Labour.
The Nationalists might be reluctant, knowing they would be accused of being wreckers or, worse, aiding the Conservatives.
Ms Sturgeon has already tacitly acknowledged this is how things would work out.
In an interview with The Herald last week, she accepted she would have to win the support of scores of Labour rebels if she wanted to force SNP policies through the Commons.
It means the SNP would be limited in what it could achieve but it would not be powerless, as it could withhold support from specific Labour policies in Commons votes.
In theory, that could lead to a series of trade-offs: SNP support on some issues in return for concessions on others.
But Labour would have cause to be wary.
Over the weekend, Conservative Home Secretary Theresa May and and Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg both claimed if Labour came second in the election but formed a government with SNP backing, the new administration would not be accepted as "legitimate" by a large section of the public.
A minority Labour government would need to win people's confidence by governing efficiently and effectively.
It could not risk becoming a soap opera of back-room deals, climb-downs and Commons defeats.
Mr Miliband would have build alliances where he could.
On the economy, for example, the SNP backs his tax plans and, despite much rhetoric to the contrary, shares a similar plan to cut spending and eliminate the deficit.
He might expect support from an SNP that struggled to find good reasons to oppose him.
On the other hand, measures that could not command a Commons majority would most likely never see the light of day.
It is a situation the SNP could easily exploit.
If an informal, uneasy and unpredictable Labour-SNP alliance emerges, it might provoke an "anti-Scottish" backlash south of the Border which could feed support for independence.
If the SNP finds itself on the sidelines more often than not at Westminster, outvoted on Trident and devo max, it will claim "Scotland's voice" was not being heard.
But will it cause "chaos and constitutional crisis" as Gordon Brown claimed at the weekend or "merry hell," as another former prime minister, Sir John Major, warned?
It might be in the SNP's long-term interests not to rock the boat too vigorously.
With the SNP leadership apparently cautious about holding a second independence referendum until it can be sure of victory, Ms Sturgeon's is promising to be a "constructive and responsible" ally for Labour.
Supporting a successful Labour government would go down well in Scotland. So well it could make Scottish Labour redundant in the eyes of many voters.
Her ultimate aim is to advance the cause of independence but that does not mean she has to wage all out war at Westminster from the word go.
We'll only really know where the balance of power lies when the votes are cast. But we do know this election is a lot more complex than sifting through a pile of manifestos and picking the one you like best.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article