RAPE victims will be forced to justify themselves to the taxman to secure child tax credits under the Government's reforms, MPs have heard.
The SNP's Roger Mullin questioned the morality of Chancellor George Osborne's Budget, as he argued women who have been raped would not receive "decent treatment".
Support for children through tax credits and universal credits is to be limited to two children, affecting children born after April 2017, in a bid to save £1 billion.
The Budget document notes the Department for Work and Pensions and HMRC will develop "protections" for women who "have a third child as a result of rape", the Commons was told.
But Mr Mullin, who took Gordon Brown's former seat of Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath in May's General Election, said: "What on earth is moral about dragging women to have to talk about the fact that they may have been raped to get some decent treatment out of benefits in this society? What can possibly be moral about that?
"I would appeal to the Government to, for goodness sake, you may seek savings in many other parts of welfare but don't punish children and don't force women who have gone through the trauma of rape to have to justify themselves to the taxman."
Mr Mullin earlier said he was "stunned" by remarks from Conservative Jacob Rees-Mogg (North East Somerset) that the Budget was highly moral.
He said: "It reminded me that today is the 131st anniversary to the day of the formation of the National Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children - on the very day that this Government brings in a Budget that attacks children, tax credits for children."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article