MASS surveillance of citizens by the secret service is "out of control", according to the former Liberal Democrat leader Lord Ashdown, as he called for an inquiry into privacy.
Lord Ashdown criticised scaremongering by "lazy politicians" who frighten people into thinking "al Qaida is about to jump out from behind every bush and therefore it is legitimate to forget about civil liberties" in a newspaper interview published online last night.
Although Lord Ashdown -who led the LibDems from 1988 until 1999 - said he was speaking for himself, his views are understood to be shared by other senior members of the party.
He is the latest senior politician to demand a review of the powers of Britain's intelligence agencies - GCHQ, MI5 and MI6 - and the laws and oversight which underpin their activities.
He said surveillance should only be conducted against specific targets when there was evidence against them. Dragnet surveillance was unacceptable, he added.
He also criticised the Labour party, which was in power when the agencies began testing and building many of their most powerful surveillance capabilities.
Labour's former home secretary Jack Straw was responsible for introducing the Regulation of Investigatory Power Act 2000 (Ripa), which made the programmes legal. He said: "Ripa was a disgraceful piece of legislation. Nobody put any thought into it. Labour just took the words they were given by the intelligence agencies."
He said he was "frightened by the erosion of our liberties".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article