A NURSE in Scotland will be almost £240 better off on average than their English counterpart, the Scottish Government has boasted, after it decided to grant a 1% pay deal to all NHS staff.
South of the Border, increases of 1% will be given to some staff in the NHS from April but the UK Government will not grant the pay deal to hundreds of thousands of public health workers who are on so-called progression pay; annual hikes for time served.
Trade unions denounced the deal in England and threatened strike action. Alex Neil, the Scottish Health Secretary, insisted Edinburgh's decision to accept the NHS pay review body's recommendation in full meant NHS staff in Scotland would get a better deal than their counterparts south of the Border.
He said all NHS staff groups in Scotland would receive a 1% pay hike and that the pay of those earning under £21,000 would be supplemented to ensure they received a total rise of £300.
David Cameron's spokesman said: "As a result of the decisions that have been made with regard to the NHS in England, there is £200 million more available in 2014/5 to go on the front line. I'll leave it to the First Minister to explain why that isn't the case in Scotland."
Mr Cameron stressed that taking into account the 1% pay rise as well as incremental pay, then everyone in the English NHS would get "at least a 1% pay rise".
But trade unions responded angrily. Unison said the Coalition's decision had shown "complete contempt" for NHS staff in England while the GMB said the blocking of a full 1% pay rise was a "personal insult" to NHS staff and made clear preparations would be made for a ballot on industrial action.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article