LABOUR is examining plans to include more than 1.5 million extra people in automatic workplace pension schemes, according to shadow work and pensions secretary Rachel Reeves.
The proposal to include lower earners in the Government's pensions auto- enrolment scheme would include more than one million lower-earning women who Labour say have been excluded from the project.
In a speech to the Resolution Foundation, Ms Reeves was to say the rise in zero-hours contracts, part-time and low-paid jobs means more people risk missing out on the chance to save for retirement.
Labour estimates the proposal to lower the threshold for auto-enrolment from the current £10,000 to the national insurance lower earnings limit of £5772 will cost £20 million by 2018/19 due to extra pensions tax relief.
The party is examining plans to pay for the proposed scheme by cutting the cost of appeals against fitness-to-work assessments, which cost the Department for Work and Pensions £30 m last year.
Ms Reeves was to say: "For far too many people the insecurity they face during their working life is set to continue when they retire.
"The Government's failure to encourage more people to save threatens to store up huge costs for taxpayers in the future with a rising benefits bill."
Neil Carberry, CBI director for employment and skills, said: "Given we are half-way through the roll-out of automatic enrolment, changing the rules again is unlikely to assist businesses or workers. It's not clear that automatically enrolling this group is necessarily in their long-term interests."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article