David Cameron has said there can be a deal on televised leaders' debates - as long they do not take place during the election campaign.
The Prime Minister also issued his strongest call yet for Northern Irish parties to be included.
His comments could leave broadcasters scrambling to organise the highly-anticipated showdowns within weeks.
The Tory leader has faced accusations he is "running scared" of the debates.
His threat to boycott the events unless the Greens were included led to a change of heart by television companies.
But he appears now to have publicly stated another two conditions, which senior Conservatives have been working on behind the scenes.
These include the participation of smaller parties from Northern Ireland, including the DUP who many Tory MPs believe they enter government with if there is a hung parliament in May.
The general election campaign is expected to get underway when the Westminster Parliament closes at the end of March.
There will then be an intense five-week period of electioneering before voters go to the polls on May 7.
The latest suggestion from broadcasters includes the SNP, the Greens and Plaid Cymru, alongside four other parties UKip, the Lib Dems, Labour and the Tories.
Channel 4 and Sky would also pit Mr Cameron in a head-to-head against Labour leader Ed Miliband.
The Prime Minister insisted that he was saying "Yes" to the debates.
But he said the current proposals "doesn't quite make sense".
"It was the broadcasters that decided not only to include the Greens, but they then decided to include Plaid Cymru from Wales and the SNP from Scotland and I think the Labour Party and myself both made the point that you can't have one part of the UK - Scotland or Wales - without having another part - Northern Ireland."
Later he added: "I thought at the last election they were excellent, the debates, but they took the life out of the election campaign. We know when the election is, so let's get on with the debates before that campaign begins
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article