DAVID Cameron has been urged to "get a grip" after claims the UK Government could breach its £120 billion welfare cap next year - a charge rejected by the Department for Work and Pensions and the Treasury.
Leaked documents said the Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) was "one of the largest fiscal risks currently facing the Government", leaving it "vulnerable" to a breach in the cap for 2015/16.
Rachel Reeves, for Labour, said: "The Work Capability Assessment is in meltdown, there are huge backlogs for Personal Independence Payments, a Work Programme that's failing disabled people and the chaos of Universal Credit.
"It is a catalogue of total failure and threatens huge costs to the taxpayer.
"David Cameron must urgently get a grip of this chaotic department."
But the DWP said it was "outrageous" to suggest it was on track to breach the cap, which covers welfare payments excluding the state pension and some unemployment benefits.
If the total annual benefit spend comes in over the cap, ministers must go to the UK Parliament to explain and ask MPs to approve additional spending.
The leaked memos said the cost of ESA was projected to rise by nearly £13 billion by 2018/19, largely due to people moving on to the benefit from Jobseeker's Allowance.
A DWP spokesman said: "These are spurious scenarios and do not reflect our forecast of future spend provided at the Budget.
"It is outrageous to somehow link these to us potentially breaching the welfare cap."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article