A COALITION of charities has criticised the gap between the Scottish Government's ambitions and its achievements on environmental matters.
The "report card" by the independent Institute of European Environmental Policy, on behalf of RSPB Scotland, the Scottish Wildlife Trust and WWF Scotland, said that while the Government had very good intentions, it could do better. It found that Scotland's environmental policies were often well ahead of others in the UK and in Europe, but there was a significant gulf between their goals and achievements.
Focusing particularly on the three key areas of agriculture, marine protection and climate change, the research examines the threats facing each, and current measures or legislation proposed to address these pressures.
It recognises that Scotland has some of the most ambitious objectives for mitigating climate change to be found in Europe and says there has been encouraging progress, particularly in renewable energy where capacity has grown rapidly.
However, there were "considerable concerns" about meeting mitigation targets for 2020 and 2030.
Stuart Housden, Director, RSPB Scotland, said: "If this study was to be summarised, the proverbial 'could do better' of the school report would be most apt."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "The Government is confident it is ahead of many countries in taking positive action and will continue to do all it can."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article