NICK Clegg and Theresa May have locked horns in a bitter row over immigration after the Deputy Prime Minister brushed aside a proposal in a leaked Home Office memo to introduce a cap on European Union (EU) migrants, branding it "illegal and undeliverable".
The memo suggested the Home Secretary wanted to introduce a cap of 75,000 a year with professionals and high-skilled migrants from wealthy countries such as Germany, Austria or the Netherlands allowed in only if they had a job offer and lower-skilled workers permitted to settle only if they were employed in posts where there was an identified shortage.
Last month, net migration jumped by 15,000 to an annual total of 182,000, well above the Coalition aim of having it below 100,000.
But Mr Clegg used his regular Whitehall press conference to pour ice water on the proposal, saying: "My advice to the Home Office is to spend less time leaking policies that are illegal and undeliverable and spend more time delivering on the policies we have agreed as a coalition; notably, the reinstatement of exit checks."
He said the leaked proposal to "pull up the drawbridge" on migration from other EU states would be a "disaster" for British business
Earlier, Ms May made clear reform of the right to free movement should form part of any negotiations on new arrangements for the UK's membership of the EU.
The leak was regarded as a classic pre-manifesto kite-flying exercise.
She said: "There is a growing concern about the way in which people can move freely across Europe."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article