THE House of Commons authorities have already made contact with the SNP about the prospect of a surge of Nationalist MPs descending on Westminster following the General Election.
Sources have revealed that Commons officials have been trying to gauge potential numbers for accommodation purposes as often MPs from one party are housed in the same corridor or corridors.
The accommodation of MPs can be something of a nightmare for the main parties; in the past members have had to been housed in corridors for weeks before appropriate office space is found.
The main parties have accommodation whips to sort MPs in terms of who gets preference; grandees such as Cabinet Ministers past and present tend to get the plushest offices overlooking the Thames.
The SNP has never had an accommodation whip before because of its comparatively small number of MPs but if the polls are right, then it might be that the party will need one after May 7.
Today, Scottish MPs are eagerly awaiting the latest poll out this morning from Lord Ashcroft, the Tory peer, who has done in-depth surveys on a number of key constituencies north of the border, thought to have included those of Liberal Democrat MPs Danny Alexander, Jo Swinson and Michael Moore as well as Labour's Jim Murphy and Douglas Alexander.
Lord Ashcroft has been teasing MPs saying how the snapshot is "a humdinger". It is expected to confirm the SNP surge and that Labour could be facing meltdown in Scotland in just three months' time.
Senior Nationalist sources are insisting they are not getting carried away with the flow of polls suggesting their party will win the lion's share of Scotland's contingent of 59 MPs. "We're not counting our chickens and will be fighting for every single vote," said one MP.
But yet another snapshot has proved appetising reading for Nicola Sturgeon and her colleagues, placing the SNP on 48 per cent and Labour on 27, which could translate into Labour losing as many as 30 of its 41 Scottish seats.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article