MINISTERS have been accused of putting Britain's military capabilities at risk by "bungling" money-saving army reforms.
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) criticised the Ministry of Defence (MoD) for failing to consult the head of the Army fully before pushing ahead with deep cuts to regular forces.
It also gave little consideration to whether it was possible for reservist numbers to be near-doubled by 2019, and it managed to squander millions of pounds through a flawed deal with Capita.
The verdict, delivered in the cross-party committee's report on the controversial Army 2020 programme, comes as Nato leaders gather in Wales.
The scheme is intended to save more than £10 billion over a decade, by cutting 20,000 personnel from the regular army and increasing reservists to 30,000.
But the National Audit Office (NAO) has suggested that the recruitment target could take six years longer than planned to hit.
The committee said it "remained to be convinced" that the goal could be reached on time.
Chair Margaret Hodge described the handling of the project so far as "astonishing".
"The decision to reduce the size of the Army was driven by the need to make financial savings in a time of austerity," she said.
"However, it is remarkable that the chief of the general staff was not involved in all stages of the decision-making process, given the magnitude and importance of the change required, and its impact on the service.
"The MoD did not test the feasibility of recruiting and training the 30,000 reserve soldiers it needs by 2019. The strength of the Army Reserve has stayed at around 19,000 for the last two years, and we remain to be convinced that the MoD will recruit the required numbers in time.
"The Army told us that shortfalls in recruitment are increasing the risk of capability gaps emerging in some parts of the Army's structure. This in turn increases the risk of additional pressure being placed on regular troops."
Capita, the private firm brought in to handle recruitment, was said to have brought in just 2,000 reserves in 2013/14 against a target of 6,000.
The goal for recruitment of regulars was also missed by 30 per cent, according to the committee.
Yet the company was still awarded its full bonus.
Defence Secretary Michael Fallon said: "The chief of the general staff and I are confident that we will reach our target of 30,000 trained army reservists by 2018/19.
"Indeed, we have arrested the many years of decline and neglect that has plagued our reserve forces and now we need to build on that.
"Our Army 2020 plans are on track and will deliver by 2020 the army we need to counter the wide range of threats we face."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article