ED Miliband has been ridiculed and likened to Moses by his political opponents after unveiling an eight-feet high stone slab bearing Labour's key manifesto pledges, which the party leader wants to install in the Downing St garden if he wins power.
On the campaign trail in Nuneaton, David Cameron mocked the "tombstone", saying: "If you have got a problem with judgement, I don't think that's going to help."
London Mayor Boris Johnson chipped in on what has already been dubbed "Stonegate", saying: "It's absolutely crazy. You've already got the Labour leader commissioning great stones that are going to be engraved like the commandments of Moses or Hammurabi or something with what he wants to do."
Chancellor George Osborne recalled Neil Kinnock's 1992 campaign as Labour leader, tweeting: "Carving stone monument for Downing Street garden looks like a Sheffield Rally moment. Once again, Ed Miliband's judgment not rock solid."
Unveiling the stone slab, Mr Miliband said: "These six pledges are now carved in stone. They are carved in stone because they won't be abandoned after the General Election.
"I want the British people to remember these pledges to remind us of these pledges, to insist on these pledges, because I want the British people to be in no doubt, we will deliver them."
Later, he denied the slab was "naff" and added: "I'm going to leave the landscape gardening part of this to other people. I don't measure the curtains or the garden."
Meantime, Chris Leslie, the Shadow Treasury Chief Secretary, was asked if Labour had planning permission to erect the slab in No 10's rose garden. He replied: "Oh for goodness sake. If that's what the election is hanging on...we'll make sure we abide by all the regulations that are there."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article