Controversial plans to conduct secret inquiries into MPs' expenses have been criticised.
The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa) said MPs and peers will no longer be named when investigations are launched, in the interests of fairness.
The Standards Committee and the independent Committee on Standards in Public Life (CSPL) have voiced concerns about the apparent lack of openness.
Compliance officer Peter Davis said the change would balance the "public interest in transparency" with "operational needs and fairness." He highlighted the "reputational damage" caused to MPs by naming them before investigations are complete.
The measure, put out for consultation in September, has come under fire for making the Ipsa regime less transparent than the one it replaced in 2010, when the identities of those under investigation were routinely confirmed.
The CSPL pointed out that the commissioner unhesitatingly named MPs they were investigating.
The Standards Committee's response said: "There is clearly a difficult balance between transparency and the fair and efficient conduct of investigations. We consider it is possible that the changes proposed in the consultation may tilt the balance too far from transparency.
"We invite Ipsa to consider whether the advantages of removing the assessment stage outweigh the transparency brought by the current system, in which names are released if it appears there may be grounds for investigation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article