LORD Falconer, the Shadow Lord Chancellor, is to try to reintroduce a Bill at Westminster on assisted dying.
In the last Parliament, the Scottish peer proposed legislation, which would have enabled people with less than six months to live to receive drugs to end their own lives; subject to certain safeguards. But the Bill ran out of time.
Now, in light of the Jeffrey Spector case, the peer, who served as Lord Chancellor in Tony Blair's Government, made clear he would seek to reintroduce his Bill, if he is successful later today in the ballot for Private Member's Bills in the Lords.
He explained: "My Bill would allow somebody who's got a diagnosis of six months or less to live, and it's his firm and settled intention to take his own life and he's capable of making that decision, he can be provided with a prescription of drugs that he can take himself, he or she can take themselves, in order to take their own lives."
He added: "I don't know where Mr Spector had got to in relation to the prognosis but, if the position were that he knew that that option would have been open to him later when he was diagnosed with six months or less to live, then he would have been able to avail himself of the rights in my Bill."
Mr Spector, a 53-year-old businessman, who had been suffering from an inoperable tumour on his spine, died at the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland.
His widow Elaine and their three daughters Keleigh, 21, Courtney, 19, and Camryn, 15, said that despite their "difficult and painful time", they respected his decision.
Mr Spector told them that he could not face the thought of being paralysed or becoming reliant on them. Last Wednesday, he travelled to Zurich. On Friday, after a final meal with his family, he took a dose of barbiturates and died.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article