THE total bill for MPs' expenses and costs rose from £98 million to £103 million last year, according to the latest figures.
More than £80 million was spent on staff, and MPs also claimed more than £11 million on accommodation, travel and subsistence during 2013/14 and almost £11 million on office costs.
The bill for accommodation, covering hotels, rented homes and utility bills, was £6.9 million, with £4.5 million claimed for travel and subsistence.
The details emerged in the annual release of information by expenses watchdog the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa).
The biggest claim was by the DUP's Jim Shannon, with a total spend of £229,262, including £38,215 on travel reflecting the cost of getting to his Strangford constituency, and £12,126 on hotels.
Mr Shannon exceeded his budget for both staffing costs, spending £143,074, and office costs, at £35,847.
Ipsa's chairman Sir Ian Kennedy claimed the system was saving money compared to the discredited regime of tthe expenses scandal.
He said: "About 90 per cent of the costs go on staffing and running an office: unsurprising given that MPs operate the equivalent of 650 small businesses.... As part of our system of regulation, we have reduced the cost to the taxpayer by £58 million. Such is the progress made since the scandals which came to light in 2009, that our work is now attracting the attention of Parliaments around the world."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article