Labour risks becoming a party of ghosts representing a land that no longer exists if it resists English devolution to protect its Scottish power base, one of the party's senior MPs has indicated.
Frank Field insisted Labour must "speak for England" and crucially not try and "protect privileges" such as its large number of Scottish MPs, which in any case may diminish in the face of growing support for the SNP.
He criticised Labour's plan to hold a constitutional convention before deciding how to proceed with devolution within the UK, saying it was inevitable that there will eventually be four parliaments - for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
During a backbench debate on devolution, Mr Field told the Commons: "My great fear has always been that, for quite understandable reasons for the protection of our privileges, Labour might seem to be wishing not to speak for England.
"I think it's crucial if we are going to have a life as a party that we be seen not to be joining with this debate but actually leading it.
"The worry is that if we protect privileges which may not be our privileges in the next parliament anyway, with a large representation of Scottish Labour MPs in this House of Commons, we will increasingly be seen as a party of ghosts, representing a land which no longer exists."
He went on: "There are those siren voices who have been active in this debate since 1977 who have told us that we cannot move with constitutional changes unless we have these mega-conventions to debate what the issues are.
"The true fact is it's quite clear now what the constitutional settlement is going to be, whether we like it in this chamber or not.
"We are going to move to a situation where there are four parliaments, where England has its voice, Scotland has its voice, Wales has its voice and Northern Ireland has its voice."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article