CONTROVERSIAL guidance on gender segregation sent to every university in Scotland has been withdrawn following a public outcry.
The guidelines backed the separation of men and women if demanded by visiting speakers.
But the advice sparked a huge backlash amid accusations it was sexist and condoned discrimination.
The guidelines were sent to all Scottish universities by the sector body Universities UK.
Last night the body withdrew part of the document, a controversial case study on the issue, in the face of growing anger.
But it still insisted that the legal situation around the issue was "unclear".
Earlier politicians had condemned the idea that audiences attending events at universities should be separated on the basis of their gender.
Downing Street said that David Cameron felt "very strongly" that such a situation would be wrong and should not be allowed to happen. His official spokesman also made clear that the Prime Minister, who was visiting the north-east of England, was prepared to consider a change in the law if necessary.
Conservative cabinet minister Michael Gove also said: "We should not pander to extremism. Speakers who insist on segregating audiences should not be indulged by educators.This guidance is wrong and harmful." Earlier this week the Scottish Parliament's Education Committee agreed to write to Universities UK and Universities Scotland seeking clarification on the document.
SNP MSP Stewart Maxwell described the advice as flying "in the face of equal rights - to say nothing of common sense".
The Equality and Human Rights Commission said that while the law allows segregation by gender in religious premises it was "not permissible" in an academic meeting or open lecture.
ECHR chief executive Mark Hammond said: "The UUK's guidance accepts that the initial question is whether that segregation is discriminatory and concludes that the imposition of segregated seating in certain circumstances could be permissible.
"The guidance also gives the impression that the right to manifest or express a religious belief should be balanced against the right not to be discriminated against."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article