THE Government is to pay out more than £220 million to a US defence firm after a tribunal found it had unlawfully terminated a contract to provide the controversial eBorders programme.
An Arbitration Tribunal awarded Raytheon Systems Limited £49.98m in damages after it found the processes the now-defunct UK Border Agency used when reaching a decision to scrap the agreement were flawed, a letter from the Home Secretary to Keith Vaz MP reveals.
The Home Office must pay also Raytheon £9.6m for disputed contract change notices, £126m for assets acquired through the contract between 2007 and 2010 and £38 million in interest. eBorders, devised by the Labour government in 2003, was designed to count everyone in and out of the UK by collecting advance passenger information on all scheduled inbound and outbound journeys to and from the UK.
In her letter to Mr Vaz, Theresa May said: "The Treasury will work with the Home Office to make sure these costs are met without any impact on frontline services. We are looking carefully at the tribunal's detailed conclusions to see if there are any grounds for challenging the award.
"The Government stands by the decision to end the eBorders contract with Raytheon. This decision was, and remains, the most appropriate action to address the well-documented issues with the delivery and management of the programme."
The Home Secretary said key milestones had been missed by Raytheon in 2010 and parts of the programme were running at least a year late: "The situation the Government inherited was, therefore, a mess with no attractive options. All other alternatives available to the Government would have led to greater costs than the result of this tribunal ruling."
Home Office permanent secretary Mark Sedwill has asked the National Audit Office to conduct a full review of eBorders from its inception, she added.
Earlier this year, head of the UK Border Force Sir Charles Montgomery told MPs the troubled scheme had been "terminated" in its current form.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article