HOLYROOD may rethink a ban on MSPs employing family members meant to come into force next year.
The Parliament is likely to consider giving relatives of MSPs an extra year in the job because of fears the original plan could trigger a legal challenge.
Sir Neil McIntosh's 2009 review of Holyrood expenses backed ending the practice of MSPs hiring close family members after widespread concern about relatives getting taxpayer-funded jobs.
Parliament approved a two-part ban: no new family members could be hired, and relatives currently mon MSPs' staff had to quit from mid-2015.
It was believed then that the Holyrood election would be in May 2015, with the changeover of MSPs making the policy easier to enforce.
However, in a bid to avoid a clash with the 2015 Westminster poll, the next Parliament election was pushed back to 2016.
Although the number of MSPs employing family members has fallen, twelve are still registered as using public funds for this purpose.
It is understood informal discussions have taken place about delaying the 2015 ban by a year.
John Wilson, an SNP MSP for Central Scotland, said: "Following the McIntosh review, the Parliament must keep faith with public and stick to the original decision agreed by MSPs."
Michael McMahon, a Labour MSP who employs his wife, said: "I accepted the McIntosh decision at the time and I'll abide by whatever decision the Parliament makes."
A Holyrood spokesperson said there had been no formal discussion of the issue, but the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body was likely to consider the matter later this year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article