IT WAS in 1973 the good Fifers of Ballingry and Lochore elected Willie Clarke, the Communist candidate, as their councillor.
He remains the councillor for the area to this day.
Local authorities and parties have changed names, he is an independent now, but the bottom line is this is an area where the citizens are happy to continue voting into office someone who is in effect a Communist councillor.
So the Cowdenbeath constituency has among the most left-wing electorates in Britain, often comprising miners or more likely their sons and daughters, full of political self-awareness and hatred of the Westminster Tory/LibDem coalition, and surely the most rock-solid of Labour seats.
Well, up to a point. For who is the judge of what is left-wing these days? This is also at the heart of the area that did not rebel against New Labour at the time of the Iraq War, because it was intensely loyal to Gordon Brown.
Loyalty to Mr Brown also translates as loyalty to his right-hand man Alex Rowley, leader of Fife Council, who was meant to ascend to the Scottish Parliament in 2011 in Dunfermline until the bizarre redistribution of collapsing LibDem votes saw Bill Walker win the seat for the SNP, with all the fall-out after he was unmasked as a wife-beater.
That resulted in a by-election late last year which saw Labour's Cara Hilton re-take the seat.
Which takes us to the current Holyrood by-election, following the death of Helen Eadie, MSP for the constituency since 1999.
Labour will surely hold this seat comfortably. A well-respected incumbent, an experienced successor, what could possibly go wrong?
At their high water mark in 2011 the SNP put on 13% to their vote and came within 3.4% of taking the seat - the last held by Labour above the Clyde-Forth line.
Alex Rowley remains bruised from the experience of failing to hold the neighbouring Dunfermline seat and will be nervous right up until the declaration next Thursday night. He really has to win this one.
He has developed a tightly focused set of spiels for the campaign, highlighting youth unemployment and building on the achievements of Fife Council under his leadership.
But therein lies his problem. Incumbency. At by-elections incumbency is always the issue, an easy line of attack for the failures of those in office. But in the Cowdenbeath contest both the front-runners carry the burden of incumbency - the SNP's Natalie McGarry has to answer for the record of Alex Salmond at Holyrood, while Mr Rowley carries the burden of his administration's record.
You could go further and mention the parties of power at Westminster. Tory candidate Dave Dempsey is a highly self-aware 62-year-old councillor who has represented the coastal part of the constituency for six years. He is fighting the fight, but not kidding himself. Jade Holden is a different kettle of fish. She thinks everything is going swimmingly and insists that no-one on the doorsteps has made an issue of the LibDems being in coalition with the Tories at Westminster. Apparently all these mining families are queuing up to reward coalition achievements. Hmm.
There is also a Ukip candidate, Denise Baykal, whose final hustings performance did not indicate her party is making much progress, although the European elections will be the proof of that.
There are two other candidates, one building on a single issue involving a family tragedy and the right to demand an inquiry into suspicious deaths, and the other by a party attempting to bridge pro-business nationalism with Euro-scepticism.
But this is about as two-horse a race as you will ever encounter. Mr Rowley is firm favourite, nervous, but for no obvious reason. Ms McGarry, by contrast, is confident, but for no obvious reason. Only a catastrophically low poll could put the issue in doubt, and no-one really wants that.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article