PARTIES from Northern Ireland should be included in the TV debates, David Cameron has insisted in his latest contribution to the row over the election head to heads.
The Prime Minister declared he "wanted to take part" in the debates, that they should go ahead and that "good progress" had been made.
He told a campaign meeting of local Tories in Eastleigh in Hampshire: "I was told it was appalling and outrageous that I had suggested that you couldn't have one minor party without having the other minor party. I'm delighted the broadcasters have gone away and thought again; they've actually come up with more minor parties than I had in mind. I'm sure they've thought it all through and they know what they're doing."
But Mr Cameron then noted: "Although I don't seem to know why Northern Ireland is missing out; because as far as I'm concerned that is as much an important part of our United Kingdom as Wales or Scotland."
The current offer on the table from the broadcasters is a 7-7-2 format, whereby two of the debates involve not only the three main UK parties - the Tories, Labour and Liberal Democrats - but also Ukip, the SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Greens. Involving the Northern Irish parties could increase the numbers, theoretically, to 11. George Galloway, the Respect leader, has already suggested he could take legal action if his party is excluded.
The broadcasters have warned that any leader who does not agree to the final format will be "empty-chaired" and the debates will go ahead without them.
Grant Shapps, the Conservative Chairman, has indicated Mr Cameron is likely to accept a new format for TV leaders' debates while senior Tories have suggested the stumbling block could be the timing of them.
Mr Shapps said the various parties involved were "edging towards a solution".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article