Justine Miliband has spoken of her fears that husband Ed will be subjected to "really vicious" attacks during the general election campaign.
Speaking to the BBC, Mrs Miliband said she expects the attacks on her husband to get worse as the May 7 polling day gets nearer, but insisted: "I'm totally up for this fight."
Mr Miliband has been widely mocked by political opponents, the media and websites over his nasal voice, his supposed resemblance to animated film star Wallace and his inelegant consumption of a bacon sandwich.
Asked how she deals with personal attacks of this sort, Mrs Miliband said: "I think it's going to get worse, I think over the next couple of months it's going to get really vicious, really personal, but I'm totally up for this fight."
She added that "the reason is because I think this goes way beyond Ed as an individual, I think it's about whether decencies and principle count for something in political life".
Mrs Miliband revealed that her husband's biggest regret about taking the Labour leadership was "not seeing the children enough or worrying he doesn't see the children as much as he'd like".
She said that they explained his work to children Daniel, five, and Samuel, four, by saying that he leads "the red team".
"There's quite a lot of chats about what the red team's doing and who the red team's helping," she said.
Barrister Mrs Miliband has kept largely out of the limelight since her husband won Labour's top job in 2010, but hit the headlines with a speech at the party's annual conference in 2013 when she insisted she was "more than a dress".
She told the BBC: "The only reason I first gave a speech to Labour Party members at Labour Party conference was because I was so worried that by about three years in, all they knew about me was a dress I wore to Ed's speech and I thought I really want to reassure people that I am, in fact, more than a dress."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article