A Labour backbencher has launched a highly critical, outspoken attack on his own leader, claiming Ed Miliband was seen by voters as "more of a toff than David Cameron".
Simon Danczuk, who represents Rochdale, also claimed Labour had been hijacked by a north London "liberal elite", who refused to tackle important issues like immigration.
In a damning magazine interview, the MP complained that Mr Miliband would "cost me votes" at the General Election because of his voter unpopularity, even suggesting voters would "prefer to go for a pint" with the Prime Minister than the Labour leader.
"Any Labour politician that says to you, they knock on a door and Ed Miliband is popular, are telling lies. It's just not true," declared Mr Danczuk.
"I spend four hours knocking on doors on a Sunday; they(constituents) say things like: 'You're doing an alright job as MP but I don't want Ed Miliband as Prime Minister, so I won't vote for you.' So it'll cost me votes."
The MP criticised the leadership over the handling of Mr Miliband's decision to pose with a World Cup edition of The Sun.
"Harriet Harman came out and said he was right to pose with The Sun newspaper and he was right to apologise for posing with The Sun newspaper. It's that sort of double-speak from politicians...that turns people off politics.
"So when somebody hears a politician say that, you know what they think, if you pardon the language, 'what a f****** knob'. That's the reality of it," he insisted.
But later Mr Danczuk sought to clarify his comments, saying he had been "feeling emotional" when he made them after a "very difficult day".
He tweeted: "I do not meet anyone on the doorstep, who is enthusiastic about David Cameron. I want Ed Miliband in Downing Street."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article