Labour rejected Conservative claims it was planning to do a deal with the SNP over Trident after a shadow minister said that he wanted to "get rid" of the nuclear deterrent.
Party sources said that Owen Smith was merely re-stating long standing party policy and was clearly saying he backed the renewal of the ageing weapons system on the Clyde.
Mr Smith was quoted as saying: "Labour is in favour of multilateral disarmament, that's always been our policy. But our policy is not to unilaterally disarm.
"We view the world as being a very dangerous and volatile place at the moment.
"We view it being a mistake to contemplate getting rid of our nuclear deterrent. So our policy is that we will retain Trident, we will maintain a continuous at sea deterrent."
He added: "So we will pursue an independent perspective, the next Labour government, but on the issue of Trident: would but we could get rid of it, but I fear that we can't."
The Conservatives said that his comments showed that Labour would do a deal with the SNP on the issue.
A Conservative Party spokesman said: 'Labour's masked has slipped."
Labour's shadow defence secretary Vernon Coaker insisted that Labour would "not do a deal" with the SNP on Trident or any other defence issue.
A Labour spokesperson said: " As Owen's comments make abundantly clear, he supports Labour's policy of renewing Britain's Trident nuclear deterrent as a continuous at-sea system."
In a speech to the Royal United Services Institute, Mr Coaker also said said his party could not guarantee the Nato target of spending 2 per cent of GDP on defence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article