LABOUR expects to be unpopular if it wins the next general election as public spending cuts bite, one of the party's frontbenchers will say today.
Chris Leslie, the shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, will warn voters that "lower priorities will get less money".
And he will reiterate his party's stance that it will be unable to reverse cuts introduced by the Tory-Liberal Democrat Coalition.
In a speech, he will say: "I'm not heading into this expecting popularity. Quite the opposite.
"We won't be able to undo the cuts that the have been felt in recent years, and I know this will be disappointing for many people."
He will also add: "A more limited pot of money will have to be spent on a smaller number of priorities. Lower priorities will get less."
Labour is currently carrying out a "zero-based" review of every pound of government spending, and the party has claimed it would cut the deficit and return the budget to a surplus.
But Mr Leslie will also say that Labour's long-awaited policy review would not be about spending commitments - a revelation the Conservatives will seize on to say the party cannot be trusted on the economy.
After the last general election a number of senior Liberal Democrats openly said that they expected to be unpopular in government.
Chris Huhne, the then energy secretary, famously said in August, 2010: "Frankly in a year's time, I think both the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats are going to be pretty unpopular because we will have to take very, very tough decisions because of the legacy that Labour has left us in terms of this massive deficit."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article