EXPECTATIONS were high when Ed "elbow in the eye" Balls bounced his way onto the conference podium.
One comradely delegate, clearly bored by the morning's contributions, was about to leave when she asked who was up next. When she learned it was the great socialist bruiser himself, she cooed: "Ooooh! I'm staying for this; it should be interesting."
Indeed, the Shadow Chancellor and his keynote speech raise expectations that he will put a large boot into those less than compassionate Conservatives. But it seemed for the most part, the Yorkshire terrier had left his aggression on the football pitch.
His main theme was responsibility, responsibility, responsibility. With Labour now 25 points behind the Tories on economic competence and with just eight months to go to the General Election, the Yorkshire MP has his work cut out.
On the one hand, he has to prove to the punters that he means what he says when he talks about "iron discipline" on the economy, hence the decision to extend for a year the real-terms cut in child benefit and to keep the welfare cap but, on the other, he has to convince the traditionalists that he is still on their side.
Underlining the difficulty was when the SC mentioned the child benefit cut and the welfare cap, which both drew boos from the conference floor
The only humorous interlude came when he told an anecdote about how Tory hate figure Michael Gove had dinner with Rupert Murdoch and, dismissing all other potential candidates, declared only George Osborne was fit to lead the Tories post-Cameron.
The mere mention of the Chancellor's name drew a choral "oh my God" from the delegates. Mr Gove, explained Mr Balls, later offered the excuse for his endorsement of Mr Osborne, claiming he had been a bit tipsy at the time. "Tipsy?" barked the SC, "he must have been completely legless." The comrades roared. They were back on side.
Given the lacklustre nature of the Balls speech, one can only think he was leaving all the plaudits for the more important Ed later today.
Hopefully.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article