SOVEREIGNTY over defence should be removed from nation states and handed to a European defence force, according to a rising Labour politician.
The lessons of the First World War and the current crisis in the Crimea reveal "the folly of nation states" and the danger of concentrating defence in their hands, North East Scotland MSP Jenny Marra said.
She rejected criticism of the "centralising" force of Brussels and dismissed calls for an in/out referendum on the EU, insisting it should have more powers, particularly on defence.
"Anyone who has been watching the coverage following the media's reflections on the precipitation towards the First World War 100 years ago would see the folly of nation states," she said at a Scottish Labour Party conference fringe event in Perth.
"Defence forces constantly being in the power of nation states' hands is quite a dangerous place to be.
"The EU, looking to the future, perhaps a single defence force is certainly an idea that appeals to me, having been a Labour member who marched outside my own party's conference in 2003 against the invasion of Iraq.
"The idea of taking defence out of the hands of nation states appeals to me.
"I know it's not necessarily a view that is commonly shared but I think it's one in 2014, we should reflect on, certainly with the awful situation that is happening in the Crimea."
Ms Marra is seen as a rising star within the party, scoring a personal victory this week when her Member's Bill on human trafficking was adopted by the Scottish Government.
She rose from party spokeswoman on Europe, based in Brussels and Strasbourg, to second on the party's North East Scotland regional list in 2011, behind established MSP Richard Baker.
She was soon elevated to the party front bench and holds two portfolios. as shadow minister for youth employment and deputy shadow finance minister.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article