THERESA May was not consulted over the appointment of a minister who believes that MI5 covered up the death of weapons inspector David Kelly a decade ago.
The Tory Home Secretary was not asked about the decision to place Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker in the Home Office, it is understood.
Mr Baker claims in a book he authored that scientist David Kelly, who leaked information on the investigation into Saddam Hussein's so-called Weapons of Mass Destruction to BBC journalist Andrew Gilligan, was murdered in 2003 after he was found dead in a field near his home. It alleged security services staged a cover-up at the height of a controversy over claims the last Labour government "sexed up" a dossier which helped build the case for the Iraq war.
No 10 sources said the decision was signed off by the Prime Minister David Cameron.
But they refused to be drawn on whether the Conservative leader had the power to veto an appointment seen as in the gift of Liberal Democrat leader and Deputy Prime Minster Nick Clegg.
The appointment came as Mr Cameron chose not to change any cabinet ministers but handed promotions to women including Esther McVey, the former GMTV presenter who was pushed up the ranks at the Department for Work and Pensions to become employment minister. Anna Soubry was moved from her role in the Department of Health to become the first female MP to be a minister at the Ministry of Defence.
Allies of Chancellor George Osborne also fared well, with Sajid Javid made Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Matthew Hancock becoming Skills and Enterprise minister and Greg Clark installed as Tory Deputy Chief Whip. Andrew Robathan was made Northern Ireland minister replacing Mike Penning, who takes on duties at the Department for Work and Pensions.
Hugh Robertson, who was widely praised for his work on the Olympics, is rewarded by being made minister at the Foreign Office. Mr Cameron's parliamentary aide, Sam Gyimah, has been moved to the whips office.
Tories who lost their roles included Mark Hoban, Mark Prisk, Richard Benyon and Alistair Burt.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article