HENRY McLeish, the former First Minister, has been branded "misguided" after he suggested David Cameron was more hated in Scotland than Margaret Thatcher.
The ex-Labour MSP claimed the Prime Minister was undermining the Better Together campaign and that his posh image and damaging policies epitomised everything that Scots hated about the Conservatives.
"Cameron is the big risky factor for the Unionist camp. He won't be seen much in Scotland," declared Mr McLeish, who described Tory policies as being viewed in Scotland as "quite poisonous" and from an "alien political culture".
"He has got to take less of a role and I am convinced that he will be forced to take less of a role," he insisted.
"Cameron also brings that edge that even Thatcher didn't bring: the rich, posh image. Osborne is the same...They also exude this political distance so much that I would expect for Scots that Cameron is a much scarier figure than Margaret Thatcher ever was."
He added: "If we get to September 2014 and there is a high likelihood that the Tories, because the economy is recovering, are doing well, that could actually push a lot of people into the lines for voting Yes."
However, one Coalition source branded Mr McLeish "misguided", noting: "You sometimes have to wonder which side Henry is really on. This sort of thing will only help the Nationalists."
Another Whitehall insider argued that the analysis was flawed, pointing to a recent poll which showed more than half of Scots had a positive view of Mr Cameron.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article