More than three-quarters of British people want to see a cut in immigration, a survey of social attitudes has revealed.
However, fewer people now than in 2011 think immigration is bad for the economy - 47% in 2013 compared with 52% two years previously, new findings from NatCen Social Research's British Social Attitudes survey found.
The latest results of the survey, to be revealed in a BBC Two documentary The Truth About Immigration, tonight at 9.30pm and presented by political editor Nick Robinson, come nearly a week after access restrictions to the UK labour market were lifted for Romanians and Bulgarians.
Penny Young, chief executive at NatCen Social Research, said: "British Social Attitudes shows that public desire for a cut in immigration to the UK had begun to rise even before the restrictions on migrants from Romania or Bulgaria were lifted at the start of the year.
"Moreover, a majority of people who think immigration is good, economically or culturally, for the UK still want to see it cut.
"These findings highlight the complexity of this issue for politicians facing two elections in 18 months and with limited options if they want to attempt to reduce migration from Europe.
"The public broadly agrees that immigration is too high, but there are stark social divisions over the economic and cultural benefits of immigration."
The research shows 54% of respondents see immigration as good for the economy, but 55% of those who see it is as culturally beneficial also want to see it reduced.
The survey also revealed divisions among political party supporters.
Some 40% of Labour party supporters think immigration is bad for the economy but 36% believe it is good for the economy, the research shows, while 40% think immigration is bad for British culture and 41% see it as good for British culture.
Some 52% of Conservatives believe Britain's cultural life is undermined by immigration compared with 20% of LibDems.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article