RESEARCH shows that a majority of people in the UK support a mansion tax with the most fervent support in Scotland and Wales, where the least number of people would pay it.
The snapshot of more than 2000 adults for the University of Birmingham's Centre on Household Assets and Savings Management also shows the least support for the policy, being promoted in different guises by Labour and the Liberal Democrats, is in London and the South East, where the tax will hit hardest.
People were asked how they felt about four potential tax changes: the introduction of a mansion tax; council tax reform; capital gains tax reform and the re-introduction of a 50 per cent top rate of income tax.
The survey found:
*the mansion tax was the most popular of the proposed reforms with 53 per cent strongly supporting or tending to support a one per cent tax on properties worth more than £2m; 22 per cent opposed it with 21 per cent unsure either way.
*a flat council tax rate of 0.6 per cent of the value of a property, as an alternative to a mansion tax, was supported by 40 per cent of people with 27 per cent unsure either way.
*45 per cent supported increasing capital gains tax to 45 per cent with 23 per cent unsure.
*44 per cent supported the re-introduction of a 50 per cent top rate of income tax with 19 per cent unsure.
*52 per cent thought no inheritances should be taxed.
Professor Karen Rowlingson, Professor of Social Policy at the university, said: "Wealth taxation currently yields relatively little revenue in the UK compared with other taxes but our research shows there is considerable public appetite for raising more money for the public purse from such taxes, particularly a mansion tax."
Professor Andy Lymer, Professor of Accounting and Taxation at the university, added: "Understanding public attitudes to tax is important in creating effective tax systems. However, our knowledge is very limited of what these attitudes really are and how they are evolving in the UK post-financial crisis.
"This survey suggests, however, that there is an appetite for more wealth-related taxes if applied appropriately. This is, therefore, something politicians need to consider."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article