Controversial zero-hours work contracts are being used by firms to strip staff of employment benefits and rights, a group of MPs has warned.
Some companies were deliberately "dodging" their responsibilities, the Commons Scottish Affairs Committee said, and other businesses were suffering because they were being undercut by unscrupulous employers.
The comments followed a meeting MPs held with Scottish officials from USDAW, the Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers, in Falkirk. The committee said it had heard evidence firms were using "zero-hours" contracts when there was no justifiable business need.
Figures suggest up to one million people across the UK, including tens of thousands in Scotland, are thought to be on zero-hours contracts.
The Coalition Government has pledged to crack down on employers who misuse the contracts. But ministers insist they can be used legitimately and say they have no plans for a ban.
Unions say they exploit workers by expecting them to be at employers' beck and call and offering little or no chance to save or plan ahead.
Ian Davidson, the Labour MP who chairs the committee, said the meeting had heard examples of terrible practice. He said: "People being texted to come in to work in the morning only to be turned away when they get there, losing their travel costs and any other arrangements they had made.
"Obviously this would be an impossible situation for anyone with children or people to care for."
He added: "Businesses say they need the flexibility to respond to changing demand, yet it seems these contracts are being used as a way of dodging giving people the security, employment benefits and rights that they deserve. It also allows them to unfairly undercut decent employers who pay the full costs of providing proper employment."
Karen Whitefield, campaigns officer at UDDAW, said: "If major supermarkets can respond to business fluctuations without resorting to zero-hours contracts then why can't many of the businesses that currently use these contracts?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article