MPs believe being decisive is a more important trait in a good prime minister than principles, honesty or intelligence, according to a poll.
More than three-quarters of the 158 who took part in an academic study chose it as one of the top three requirements for being a successful occupant of 10 Downing Street.
By contrast, fewer than a third (32%) put being honest among their priorities and intelligence was picked only by a minority (49%) of the cross-party group.
Being principled was identified by 68% in the study by the Department of Politics and International Relations at Royal Holloway, University of London.
Margaret Thatcher emerged as the MPs' choice as the most successful prime minister since the end of the Second World War.
But the Tory, who spent 11 years in Number 10 and died last year, came only very narrowly ahead of Labour's Clement Attlee, who presided over the creation of the NHS.
Winston Churchill, whose wartime leadership often secures him top spot in polls of the best prime ministers, came fourth when judged solely on his 1951-55 term.
Sandwiched between the immediate post-war premiers in the poll - which did not include David Cameron - was Tony Blair.
Fifth spot went to Harold Macmillan, followed by Harold Wilson, Sir John Major, James Callaghan, Sir Edward Heath, Sir Alec Douglas-Home and Sir Anthony Eden. Bottom of the table was Gordon Brown who scored 3.3 out of 10 - less than half the rating of Mr Blair.
Of the MPs who responded to the questionnaire, 69 were Conservative, 67 Labour, 14 LibDem and eight from other parties.
Dr Nicholas Allen, senior lecturer in politics at Royal Holloway, said: "Attlee and Thatcher both presided over fundamental shifts in British politics, while Blair, like Thatcher, was a proven election winner."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article