MORE overseas aid should be given in the form of loans rather than handouts, with grants only for the poorest countries or for emergency situations, MPs have recommended.
The cross-party group also said the Government should consider setting up a new UK development bank to manage aid investment.
In a report, the International Development Select Committee said loans should be used to finance infrastructure projects in some of the world's poorest countries, but acknowledged that the financing would have to be carefully managed to avoid burdening fragile economies with unmanageable debt.
The MPs backed the Government's commitment to continue meeting the international target of spending 0.7% of gross national income (GNI) on overseas aid.
But the committee called on the Department for International Development, which has an office in East Kilbride, to focus grants on low-income countries with more developed, middle-income countries receiving assistance in the form of loans.
The committee's Liberal Democrat chairman Sir Malcolm Bruce said: "We believe the overwhelming drive in UK aid should continue to focus on lifting people out of poverty.
"In lower-middle-income countries there is considerable scope to use UK aid funding to support the private sector to deliver programmes that generate economic growth, create jobs, raise tax revenues and reap social benefits, although the presumption should be that such support is provided in the form of returnable capital wherever feasible."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article