AN early review of laws intended to stamp out religious sectarian abuse at football matches is being considered by MSPs.
Members of Holyrood's Justice Committee want to address concerns raised by fans about the impact of the controversial legislation.
Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill, Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland and Police Scotland Chief Constable Sir Stephen House will be asked to respond to the committee within two weeks before a formal decision is taken.
The cross-party agreement follows attempts by opposition MSPs on the committee to force an immediate ruling on whether to look again at the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Act, which received Royal Assent in January last year.
An agreement was made for the Scottish Government to review the operation of the offences after two full football seasons and to report back to Parliament by August 2015. But concerns have since been raised by fans about police tactics and the Act in general.
Independent MSP John Finnie said there is now a case to answer. "When we're down to a sizeable group of people feeling that a piece of legislation disproportionately impacts on them, then I'd like to have an early review," he said.
Tory MSP Margaret Mitchell said: "Clearly there is a lot of concern about how this legislation is operating in practice and about the drafting of it initially."
SNP MSP Sandra White, supported by party colleagues, said there is already a provision to review the law after two seasons. A Government spokesman said: "We will give full consideration to any correspondence we receive from the Justice Committee."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article