FIRST Minister Alex Salmond has been accused of "disgraceful complacency" on the health service, with the Labour leader claiming:
"The NHS under his watch is failing."
Johann Lamont hit out on the issue a week after Health Secretary Alex Neil survived a motion of no confidence in Holyrood and days after official statistics showed the NHS is missing key targets.
During First Minister's Questions, she cited the case of a woman who found a lump on her breast who was "forced to pay for private healthcare" after weeks of worry when she did not receive a hospital appointment for cancer screening.
Mr Salmond said that while some areas do "need to be improved", there has been a "very substantial improvement" in the health service compared to when Labour was last in government.
Ms Lamont told Mr Salmond: "The Scottish Government has missed its 18-week waiting time target from referral to treatment.
"It still, month after month, fails to hit its target of treating A&E patients within four hours, even after diluting the target. Bed blocking - which means people are left languishing in beds because the care system has nowhere for them to go - has gone up 300 per cent.
"The NHS is now going backwards on his watch."
She added: "Can the First Minister remind us, why does he still have confidence in his Health Secretary?"
Mr Salmond said the NHS in Scotland is "still something in which we can be really proud". He added: "The statistics that we're seeing now, although not ideal, and in some cases still to meet the targets to which we aspire, are in every single case superior to those when the Labour Party left office."
He said that in April 2006, then Labour health minister Andy Kerr had hailed figures showing 87.5 per cent of A&E patients were treated in time as "showing the vast majority of accident and emergency departments are meeting the four-hour target" and that "investment and reform in the national health service is paying off".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article