Trident will be a central issue in the General Election campaign in Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon has indicated, making clear that Labour's agreement not to renew the nuclear weapons system would be a pre-condition of any SNP deal to prop up a minority Miliband Government.
The First Minister told a briefing at Westminster: "I hope Trident and the debate around the replacement or non-replacement of Trident features very strongly in the election campaign."
While the Scottish Labour Party opposes the renewal of Trident, Jim Murphy, its new leader, is against such a policy; describing himself as a multi-lateralist.
But asked if abolishing Trident would be a condition for any post-election deal with Ed Miliband and the UK Labour Party, Ms Sturgeon replied: "For me, yes, it would be pretty fundamental. I'm in principle opposed to nuclear weapons."
She described as "economic lunacy" the intention to spend £100bn on the renewal of Trident given the scale of cuts being endured by public services and when many defence experts no longer regarded nuclear weapons as a sensible way to defend Britain .
Meantime, Ms Sturgeon together with Leanne Wood, the leader of Plaid Cymru, and Natalie Bennett, the leader of the Greens in England and Wales, joined forces to stress how they would unite "whenever possible to battle the Westminster parties' obsession with austerity".
The FM complained that there was no end in sight to the austerity programme and that the Chancellor George Osborne in his Autumn Statement set out another £15bn of cuts for Scotland.
She insisted: "It is time for a new approach to UK politics and for our parties to use their influence to bring about progressive change at Westminster."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article