THE main UK parties have "plucked from thin air" multi-billion pound targets for tackling tax avoidance and evasion simply to make their economic plans add up, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has claimed.
In a second damning report about the parties' election pledges - this time on tax and benefits - the respected economic think-tank accused the Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats of expressing a desire to raise more tax revenue in "vaguely-defined, opaque and apparently painless ways".
On tax avoidance, the Tories wanted to raise £5bn, Labour £7bn and the Lib Dems £10bn, figures, which James Browne, a senior research analyst at the IFS, said had been "plucked from thin air to make their plans add up".
In terms of proposed benefit cuts, the think-tank upbraided the Tories for not specifying where the £12bn worth of planned reductions would largely fall, complained that the Lib Dem proposals were vague and noted how Labour's policies were trivially small compared to the scale of rhetoric it had used.
It explained how there were large differences between the Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats in how to reduce the deficit further.
"But," the IFS stressed, "they share a lack of willingness to be clear about the details and an inability to resist the urge for piecemeal changes, which would make the overall system less efficient and coherent."
The think-tank concluded, given there was still a significant process of deficit reduction still to come, that households across Britain could expect the tax and benefit plans of any of the main parties to lead to a cut in average incomes.
The IFS said that because of time and resources it had not examined the SNP pledges but noted how some of them crossed over with those of the main Westminster parties.
On Conservative policy on benefits, it said there remained a £10bn gap, which would be "neither painless nor easy" to fill, noting how, given pensioner benefits were being protected, it was hard to see savings being made without sharp cuts to one or more of child benefit, disability benefits, housing benefits and tax credits.
It also noted that even with the Conservative policy of raising the threshold for the higher 40p rate of income tax to £50,000, a further 300,000 would be drawn into paying it, meaning by 2020 there would be five million people paying it.
The promise from both the Tories and Lib Dems to increase the personal allowance to £12,500 was, it noted, of "most value to those in the middle and and upper-middle of the income distribution" given that 44 per cent of adults already earned too little to pay income tax.
The IFS argued Labour's tough rhetoric on spending cuts was not matched by its announcements.
For example, its proposal to cut the winter fuel allowance for higher rate taxpayers was "fiscally irrelevant" and its plan for a one per cent cap on child benefit increases would raise "literally nothing" because of low inflation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article