A SENIOR MSP has backed calls to enhance the status of Holyrood's committee conveners.
Graeme Pearson, Scottish Labour's justice spokesman, said proposals for MSPs to elect conveners would improve scrutiny of government policy.
He said Holyrood would benefit from the same "independence of approach" shown by committees at Westminster.
Mr Pearson spoke out after Holyrood's presiding officer, Tricia Marwick, called for committee conveners to be elected by their fellow MSPs rather than installed by party bosses as at present.
It follows concerns that committees have been organising their business in a bid either to protect or attack the government, depending on the party loyalties of conveners and key members.
Electing conveners would give them an alternative mandate to pursue inquiries in the wider interests of the parliament and public, Ms Marwick believes.
Mr Pearson said: "I have a similar view and think the biggest weakness of the Parliament lies in its inability to hold government to account in an effective manner particularly - but not solely - when that government has a majority in the chamber. Many would suggest that such problems exist at Westminster but the reality of recent committee action there demonstrates an independence of approach, creating a wariness on the part of ministers. As a result, a greater care is taken to deliver clear accountability for the actions taken in the name of government policy."
He added: "A well supported committee structure should have the ability to examine the details, the actuality of government business and report the facts to the floor of the parliament."
He said the plan would have to be seen as fair to all sides but added: "I have no doubt that the Parliament could overcome that problem if it wished."
The Presiding Officer will ask Holyrood's procedures committee to consider the proposal with a view to producing recommendations for the next parliament, to be elected in 2016.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article