Former Northern Ireland Secretary Lord Mandelson has told MPs he has no regrets over his involvement in a contentious government process to deal with on-the-run republicans.
The Labour peer insisted he approached the fugitives issue in a "sensible, proportionate and principled way".
The politician was giving evidence to the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee inquiry into a scheme formulated by the last Labour government at the request of Sinn Fein that saw about 200 letters sent to so-called on-the-runs (OTRs) assuring them they were not being actively pursued by the UK authorities.
The probe was triggered by the high-profile case of John Downey, who walked free from the Old Bailey earlier this year when his prosecution for the murders of four soldiers in the 1982 IRA Hyde Park bombing was halted by a judge when it emerged that he had been sent one of the letters in error.
Lord Mandelson was not Northern Ireland Secretary when the mistakes around the Downey case were made but he was in office when the process effectively started operating in 2000.
He told the committee he was satisfied how he had acted in trying to address the issue of on-the-runs.
"No, I do not have regret in trying to find a way through the problem of OTRs, which in my view I did in a sensible, proportionate and principled way," he said.
The peer said that in his time the way letters were sent was more of a "sketchy process" rather than the more substantive administrative scheme it developed into in later years.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article