LORD Cullen of Whitekirk, who chaired public inquiries into the Dunblane massacre and the Piper Alpha oil platform disaster is to give evidence to a House of Lords investigation on the effectiveness of such hearings.
The 77-year-old peer, a former Lord Justice General and Lord President of the Court of Session, will give evidence alongside fellow Scottish peer Lord Gill, who currently holds those offices.
Lord Gill, 71, chaired the ICL Inquiry into the 2004 industrial explosion in Glasgow in which nine people died. In the first investigation of its kind into the 2005 Inquiries Act, they will be asked views on how inquiries implemented under it compare to those conducted prior to the legislation.
Tomorrow's session will also hear from Sir Robert Francis QC, who conducted two inquiries into Stafford Hospital, Sir Ian Kennedy, who led the inquiry into baby deaths at the Bristol Royal Infirmary, and Lord Bichard, who conducted the inquiry into the Soham murders. They will be asked if they believe non-statutory inquiries wield sufficient powers compared to statutory ones. The range of questions will also cover the criteria ministers should apply in deciding if a judge should chair an inquiry, how the appointment process could be improved and any changes that might shorten the hearing and lessen the expense involved.
The committee into the 2005 Act, chaired by Liberal Democrat peer Lord Shutt of Greetland, is due to report its findings by March.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article